Objective: Enable any Delivery Manager to identify, prevent, and manage scope deviations, ensuring project success.
Clear explanation for a DM (with or without experience)
This content is restricted to subscribers
Why this topic is key
-
Impact on timelines: Every unplanned requirement can delay key deliverables.
-
Budget at risk: Extra work consumes unplanned resources.
-
Quality compromised: More features with the same time often means lower quality or more errors.
-
Team credibility: Accepting uncontrolled changes undermines client trust and burns out the team.
-
Client satisfaction: Ironically, saying “yes” to everything without assessment can frustrate clients when expectations aren’t met.
Practical checklist
Before accepting or rejecting a scope change, ask:
This content is restricted to subscribers
Best practices
This content is restricted to subscribers
Errors to avoid
This content is restricted to subscribers
Illustrative examples
Negative example:
An 8-week web project. In week 5, the client requests “just one more form.” The DM accepts without reviewing the impact. Outcome: integration breaks, QA needs 3 extra days, launch is delayed by one week, and the marketing campaign is missed.
Positive example:
A data migration project. The client requests adding an unplanned dataset. The DM documents the request, analyzes the impact (+1 week and +€4,000), and presents it to the steering committee. The client decides not to include it now to keep the go-live on track.
Possible uses of AI to optimize this area
This content is restricted to subscribers
This content is restricted to subscribers
Leave a Reply